Hi All,


Attached material shared by Dwarka has just my proposal, but happen to has just 
company name without my name.

That attachment was written only for ISG. To share it ioTivity, more 
explanation needs  to be addressed as follows.



Currently IoTivity suffer from short of contribution and activity.

I think this is due to the technology incompleteness. Currently IoTivity just 
mostly focus on D2D and Cloud server little bit.

However, most of company deliver the product with cloud inter-relation. And 
cross domain based on cloud solution.

I believe, IoTivity should be extended with cloud further and the other 
vertical such as industrial domain.

For the better complete solution provider, Lightweight kernel is also required.



The other is the organizational misalignment with OCF.

IoTivity is currently separate open source project independent from OCF.

However, relationship is not so good. Very few support from OCF (just infra 
budget support) and from the OCF view it show very few response from OCF 
request. To allow more power with more responsibility into each IoTivity 
position will facilitate better communication.

So that TSC organization looks good, but BSC proposal looks little bit overhead 
considering OCF OSWG.



Looking at the beyond OCF1.0 compliant, we need to hurry up setting up the 
reorganization.

Some items looks more discussion but others may not.

Once some consensus we get, we need to move forward ASAP.



BR, Uze Choi

From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dwarkaprasad 
Dayama
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 1:48 PM
To: 'Thiago Macieira'; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: Re: [dev] Fwd: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11



Hi IoTivity dev community members,



As shared by Thiago, I am sharing another suggestion for reorg behalf of Uze.

Feedback is welcome to make better open source project organization.



Regards

Dwarka

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Software R&D Center | Software Strategy Team | Open Source Group

Open Connectivity Foundation ? OpenSource WG Vice-Chair | Spec. Cord. TG Chair

Iotivity Steering Group ? Advisory Committee



From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 3:09 AM
To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
Subject: [dev] Fwd: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11



Dear developers



Please find the notes from last Monday's ISG call.



Also, as noted, we'd like to have further discussion on the structure of the 
IoTivity project. Please find attached the beginning of said discussion. The 
organisation of the source code into Projects and subsystems is up to the 
developers working in them, so treat the attachment as a suggestion.



Uze will post a different suggestion.



---------- Forwarded Message ----------



Subject: [isg] Notes from ISG call 2017-04-10/11

Date: segunda-feira, 10 de abril de 2017, 16:44:23 PDT

From: Macieira, Thiago <[email protected]>

To: isg at lists.iotivity.org <isg at lists.iotivity.org>



IoTivity Steering Group meeting 2017-04-10

Attendees:

?                     Kathleen

?                     Thiago

?                     Valerie

?                     Uze

?                     Dwarka

?                     Omar

?                     MJ Jeong

?                     Kyeongwoon Lee



?                     IoTivity Governance

o        Concerns from Samsung

?     Does this create more work for Project Leaders? More meetings to attend?

?     Is this the correct project organisation? For example, how does 
Constrained and Node show up?

o        Next steps:

o        Thiago will post current proposal for discussion among developers

o        Uze will post counter-proposal with different project/subcommittee 
setup

?                     IoTivity API

?                     Lots of confusion between what?s public and what?s 
private API

?                     ISG did approve creation of API Function, but there were 
no volunteers

?                     Omar will see if he can find a volunteer


-----------------------------------------

-- 

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com

Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



-------------- next part --------------
HTML ?????? ??????????????...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170418/a0c02fc7/attachment.html>

Reply via email to