Em quarta-feira, 1 de mar?o de 2017, ?s 23:02:49 PST, Christian Gran escreveu: > Hi, > > tried to find working Arduino code - but couldn?t. Neither in iotivity nor > in iotivity-constrained.
Right, it isn't in constrained because, like I said, there is no one who is serious about making a device and is prototyping with Arduino. So there hasn't been motivation. On the main implementation, just search for ARDUINO (all capitals) and you'll see #ifdef and #ifndef all over the place. > Removing the broken one from iotivity means that > we remove a feature - is this correct? We change a once exitisng feature > into a marketing promisse. > Just doing the summary here, please corect me if I?m wrong :-) It's not just broken, it's uncertifiable. The Arduino implementation has never got support for security, for example. It has severe limitations on packet sizes and it even requires special firmware reflashing on the WiFi shields. If we're going to do Arduino, I again request that OCF provide a constrained profile first. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
