On Mar 2, 2017 2:56 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
IoTivity-constrained can. The whole point of this discussion is whether we should even try to get the full one to fit. or rather, the underlying question is "what does 'Iotivity' mean?" regrettably, the name of the protocol is the same as the name of the organization. If "Iotivity" were the name of the protocol, we would be talking about variant implementations of the protocol. as it stands, "implementation of iotivity" is meaningless, since iotivity _is_ an implementation. iotivity-constrained is an ocf implementation that happens to have 'iotivity' in its name. in fact it has little to do with "iotivity", as far as i can see. 2 cents, gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170302/d7a8b4a4/attachment.html>
