On 03/02/2017 09:33 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quarta-feira, 1 de mar?o de 2017, ?s 23:02:49 PST, Christian Gran escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> tried to find working Arduino code - but couldn?t. Neither in iotivity nor >> in iotivity-constrained. > > Right, it isn't in constrained because, like I said, there is no one who is > serious about making a device and is prototyping with Arduino. So there > hasn't > been motivation. > > On the main implementation, just search for ARDUINO (all capitals) and you'll > see #ifdef and #ifndef all over the place.
>From the viewpoint of a relative outsider, scattering support for a platform (especially a "minor" one, by which I mean something specific like Arduino rather than generic target like "windows" or "linux") all over the codebase seems a Bad Idea anyway. Is it possible to eventually refactor so that kind of work can happen in a "ports" tree, at which point you can then keep a distinction between "officially supported" and "contrib" targets? > If we're going to do Arduino, I again request that OCF provide a constrained > profile first. That will be a question of demand driving priorities. It's my impression that most of the OCF tech groups have their heads elsewhere at the moment.
