I'm in favor of splitting iotivity in to more Gerrit (and JIRA) projects.
Having everything in a single, monolithic project can't make things easy to
manage.  I've even got some docs and scripts that make this easy from the
infrastructure end.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Christian Gran <gran at lynxtechnology.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> totally agree that we should start with implementing the changes that did
> not receive any discussion/feedback.
> I would like to go ahead with these next Monday.
>
> Are there any opinions/thoughts about thes questions (nothing received on
> these so far):
>
> Q1:
> Do we want to create a new Jira project for Node.js named IoTivity-Node?
> If yes - we should remove the Node.js component
>
> Q2:
> shall IoTivity-constrained become an own project by renaming the
> constrained project
> or
> shall IoTivity-constrained become a component in the IoTivity project?
>
> Q3:
> Any objections about removing the fields listed there:
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_proposed_changes
> reasoning: when issuing a new ticket most of the fields are not applicable
> and will be left to their default values.
> This makes the handling of the ticket more difficult as it has to much
> noise/misleading data in it.
>
>
> Anyway - I recdommend to have a look at the two wiki pages and send me
> comments/suggestions about these.
> Please always hand the salt with the pepper - so if you have some
> criticism please also state an alternate solution/proposal :-)
>
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_proposed_changes
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_how_to_use
>
> thanks
>   Christian
>
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2017, at 16:19, Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us> wrote:
>
> On 03/27/2017 11:31 PM, Christian Gran wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there still something that needs to be changed here?
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_proposed_changes
> https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_how_to_use
>
>
> thanks
>  Christian
>
>
> I'd like to see the "proposed changes" page implemented, doesn't mean we
> have to be completely done with the other discussions.  Were there
> answers for the bits with questions? (mainly whether to have any
> presence of iotivity-constrained and iotivity-node). The updated/added
> components would be helpful in categorizing.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iotivity-dev mailing list
> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org
> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170329/db7e37ae/attachment.html>

Reply via email to