On Mar 29, 2017 4:17 AM, "Christian Gran" <gran at lynxtechnology.com> wrote:
Hi, totally agree that we should start with implementing the changes that did not receive any discussion/feedback. I would like to go ahead with these next Monday. Are there any opinions/thoughts about thes questions (nothing received on these so far): Q1: Do we want to create a new Jira project for Node.js named IoTivity-Node? If yes - we should remove the Node.js component Q2: shall IoTivity-constrained become an own project by renaming the constrained project or shall IoTivity-constrained become a component in the IoTivity project? Q3: Any objections about removing the fields listed there: https://wiki.iotivity.org/jira_proposed_changes reasoning: when issuing a new ticket most of the fields are not applicable and will be left to their default values. This makes the handling of the ticket more difficult as it has to much noise/misleading data in it. can you please clarify what you mean by component, module, and project? e.g. what does it mean to make iotivity-constrained "its own project"? would it no longer be part of Iotivity? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170329/71446a26/attachment.html>
