Hello Erik,

As I remember, the people attending the IPv6 working group meeting
agreed that the general problem area should be considered as a work
item within the AAA working group.  I purposefully did not ask whether
the specific solution in our AAAv6 draft should be considered, because
that would be premature as long as the AAA working group had not yet
made the consideration.  However, it seems to me that there isn't any
clear dividing line between these two:
  - the general problem area
  - the more specific problem as specified in the draft in question
since the draft in question does try to discuss the general problem
area.  Can you say more about the distinction you had in mind?

Regards,
Charlie P.



Erik Nordmark wrote:
> 
> > Bernard,
> > It was rough consenus on the IPv6 WG meeting that this was something that is
> > of interest of IPv6 WG and the WG supports that it becomes a AAA WG item.
> 
> I'm not sure about that one.
> For one thing the "this" above can have rather different
> interpretations:
>  - the general problem area
>  - the more specific problem as specified in the draft in question
>  - the solution specified in the draft
> 
> At the most IPNG discussed the first bullet as I recall.
> 
>   Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to