Bernard Aboba wrote:
> >
> > I think the URP WG should be chartered ASAP and AAAv6 taken
> there as a
> > possible solution. Where can I find the current proposal for the URP
> > charter?
> >
>
> Just as the AAA WG is not the appropriate place to do the
> work of subject
> area WGs, it is not appropriate for subject area WGs to design AAA
> protocols. We have separate WGs so that subject matter experts can
> congregate and focus on their area of expertise. So it would
> be best for
> URP to be handled in URP WG, AAA in AAA WG, and IPv6 in IPNG WG.
>
Well, I meant the part of the AAAv6 draft that is applicable to the URP
scope. The protocol stuff in the draft is focused on the interface(s)
between the host and an "attendant" node in the network, which clearly is
not in the AAA WG scope.
Jarno
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
