Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... > > I don't. What part of my postings makes you think so? Tony and I are > > proposing schemes that are aggregatable and that are not tied to a > > provider. > > For the record, you've yet to persuade me that these schemes are > aggregatable in the real world of competitive ISPs.
I understand the concern, but it comes down to a matter of cost/benefit tradeoff. If a geo scheme turns out to be cheaper to maintain than an ever expanding table full of holes, it will be deployed. The task at hand is finding *any* scheme that will create provider independent addresses in an operationally sound way. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
