> we have no way to force upgrade for all users of the > existing IPv6 > stacks. therefore, i believe it very important for > mobile-ip6 to be > defined so that: > - mobile-ip6 MN is interoperable with CN without HAO > support, nor > binding error message support
=> Technically, removing the must on the HAO is not a problem. In fact, regardless of deployed base, keeping a must for the HAO makes no sense IMHO. As for the BE message, I guess we need to make sure that somehow the CN tells the MN that no binding exists. Not sure what can be done about this. > - do not make them "non-conformant" => Well, the IETF doesn't make anyone non-conformant as far as I know. Hesham > > i would really like to see the change included in draft > 19. thanks. > > itojun > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
