Hello Itojun,
The home address option is the same in format as the previous version. The additional requirement now is only that now it's required to be secured somehow. Regards, Charlie P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >processing a HAO is simply replacing the source address with > >the contents of the HAO. earlier it is used to be a MUST without > >the verification step. IPv6 WG was okay with that. but people > >indentified some reflection attacks that are possible if you > >blindly accept unverified home address option. so now, it is a > >MUST with the verification step. > > IPv6 wg OKed HAO in draft 5 or 6. HAO changed a lot since then, > and i think it not reasonable for you to think that new-HAO is also > OKed automaticalliy. > > itojun > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
