Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > > > the point is this verification can be done in many ways. > > but a correspondent node may only run services which won't benefit > from route optimization (i.e,. "hit and run" short exchanges typical > of a DNS server). > > Let's assume the measured binding cache hit rate is 0% for a > particular server -- doens't it make sense from an efficiency > standpoint to be able to disable the binding cache and the HAO > verification on that server?
have you read the latest MIPv6 spec? there is an explicit code in the Binding Ack which says "Route Optimization unnecessary due to low traffic". the CN just has to refuse the binding with this code. the spec also says the MN should not run route optimization if the traffic is low/short. it can use its CoA. regards Vijay -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
