you are both right. it was closed as 'Adopted' after there was concensus on the mailing list. see, issue 45 at http://www.piuha.net/~jarkko/publications/mipv6/MIPv6-Issues.html
it was reopened (unfortunately) as issue 53. Vijay Michael Thomas wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If the intent is to support mobility in IPv6 networks as an integral > > aspect of the protocol, I believe the HAO processing is a MUST. I > > believe the Mobile IP WG is of this opinion. > > That sure hasn't been my read of the consensus. > In fact, the consensus seems to be exactly > opposite. > > Mike > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
