inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alper E. YEGIN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Pekka Savola'
> Cc: 'Nick 'Sharkey' Moore'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Optimistic DAD draft ...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Tony,
> 
> > True, but the term 'hand-off' implies a make-before-break process, 
> > else the MN is just establishing itself on a new link. Given it has 
> > the opportunity to be aware of multiple links, it can 
> decide when to 
> > switch. I am arguing that it complete DAD 'before' it makes that 
> > decision, not after.
> 
> I don't think we can consider all "handoffs" as 
> 'make-before-break'. There exists some link-layer 
> technologies that allow this, but not all have such capability. 

Then DAD latency should be the least of the concerns. 

> 
> Completing DAD before handover requires either movement 
> anticipation or make-before-break, both of which are not 
> widely applicable. Therefore solving DAD latency for general 
> case is a valid approach, imo.

My argument is that all MNs anticipate movement, and establish DAD
before they really make the move. Yes this will generate some overhead
if the node doesn't move, but that is a minor cost in the grand scheme
of things.

Tony 

> 
> alper
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Tony
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:32 PM
> > > To: Tony Hain
> > > Cc: 'Nick 'Sharkey' Moore'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: Optimistic DAD draft ...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Tony Hain wrote:
> > > > [...] it would seem the prudent thing for a MN to do is
> > > establish DAD
> > > > for all candidate prefixes well before it is ready to 
> start using
> > > > them. [...]
> > > 
> > > Isn't there a problem with how this could be done, as
> > > currently specified?
> > > 
> > > One can't perform DAD before being on the link.
> > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick 
> > > > > 'Sharkey' Moore
> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:58 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Optimistic DAD draft ...
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > G'day IPng-ers,
> > > > > 
> > > > > One of the big issues in getting low-latency
> > > > > handovers working for IPv6 mobility is the long delay 
> involved 
> > > > > in
> > > > > completing DAD.
> > > > > 
> > > > > One option is to allow the Mobile Node to communicate 
> while the 
> > > > > address is still Tentative (optimistically assuming that DAD 
> > > > > will succeed), but to adjust its ND / SAA behaviour 
> in order to 
> > > > > minimize disruption in case of an address conflict 
> (and maintain 
> > > > > correct interoperation with
> > > unmodified nodes).
> > > > > 
> > > > > We've kicked the idea around a little on mobile-ip,
> > > > > and I've formalized my thoughts into an internet draft,
> > > which should
> > > > > get published soon.  In the meantime, you can find it at
> > > > > <http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/ipv6/fastho.htm>
> > > > > (tentatively titled draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00).
> > > > > 
> > > > >         I'd be interested in your opinions on the 
> draft, and its
> > > > > potential suitability for standards track.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > cheers,
> > > > >         Nick
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Nick 'Sharkey' Moore                    
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Research Fellow, CTIE                   Tel: +61 3 9905 3707
> > > > > Monash University,  Australia           Fax: +61 3 9905 5358  
> > > > > 
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > > > > IPng Home Page:                      
> > > http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > > > > FTP archive:               
> > >        ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > > > > Direct all administrative requests to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > 
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > > > IPng Home Page:                      
> http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > > > FTP archive:             
>          ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > > > Direct all administrative requests to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> > > Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
> > > Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to