This question came up during one of the ISATAP draft revisions. We were intending to adopt Marc's proposed reserved address space for documentation, but couldn't find a proper reference. I favor the /16 example - it should be large enough to cover unanticipated future use cases.
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marc Blanchet wrote: > > -- mercredi, octobre 23, 2002 10:43:58 -0400 Thomas Narten > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/a icrit: > > >>I'd like to formally request the following from the WG on this >>document: >> >> - I'd like to see it become a WG document (to become a BCP RFC) >> >> - I'd like for folks here to review it and post any issues they have >> with it >> >> - I'd like to call special attention to the following text that it >> includes: >> >> >>> In addition, experience with IPv4 has shown that it is useful to >>> reserve an address block for documentation purposes that will never >>> be assigned for actual use in a network [DOC]. Such addresses can >>> safely be used in documentation, without the worry that someone will >>> accidentally (and incorrectly) configure them on a real network and >>> cause traffic intended for the legitimate owner of those addresses to >>> be impacted. >>> >>> This document reserves the IPv6 address block XXXX::/32 for >>> documentation purposes. >> >>There has been some private discussion about the need for addresses >>for documentation, but it's probably worth discussing how much address >>space is needed for this purpose, and what the prefix should be (e.g., >>allocate out of 001/3?). the /32 length is a strawman. >> > > > - great to see that the proposal I made on address space for documentation > is surviving! > - I would propose that at least the space reserved is in well known > boundaries: /16, /24, /32. > - 3fff::/16 is for me the best: it is large, but simple and would cover > most cases needed. > - if not agreeable (too large), then /24. which would have room for > aggregates in bgp routing. > > Marc. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
