> My point is that I believe that a clean separation should be made > between global addresses and scoped addresses. We fully understand > how globals and link-locals work. All the others are still being > hashed out. If we make this break, the address architecture can > move along the standards track. The (great amount of) additional > work that needs to be done on scoped addresses can be carried out > under the scoped address architecture.
actually I'd claim that we don't really understand how link-locals work, at least not from the applications viewpoint. but I enthusiastically support the idea of separating the work on globals from the work on scoped addresses. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------