>      My point is that I believe that a clean separation should be made
> between global addresses and scoped addresses.  We fully understand
> how globals and link-locals work.  All the others are still being
> hashed out.  If we make this break, the address architecture can
> move along the standards track.  The (great amount of) additional
> work that needs to be done on scoped addresses can be carried out
> under the scoped address architecture.

actually I'd claim that we don't really understand how link-locals
work, at least not from the applications viewpoint.  but I enthusiastically 
support the idea of separating the work on globals from the work
on scoped addresses. 

Keith
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to