Hello I belive that some ND changes have to remain in the MIPv6 spec. The ND changes without which the base MIPv6 spec is incomplete and can not be made to work well should remain in the spec. An example of this is RA timers. Without faster RAs, the movement detection algorithm takes way to much time to be effective. Yes, there are better ways to do this and once they are specified, they can be implemented and deployed. However, without decent movement detection, the base spec is incomplete.
On the other hand, other changes (such as what to do on DAD collision) apply to more the just mobility cases and would provide greater benefit as separete specs. Just my $0.02 -vlad ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Vladislav Yasevich Tru64 UNIX - IPv6 Project Lead Hewlett Packard Tel: (603) 884-1079 Nashua, NH 03062 ZKO3-3/T07 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------