On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Keith Moore wrote: > > > ....but how on earth did we end up in this discussion? From what I > > remember of the voting in Atlanta we had consensus for a limited > > version of site-locals...not creating a separate address structure? > > as I recall, we had consensus for limiting site-locals, > as well as widespread support for the idea that PI globals were needed. > > it's not an either-or. > > Keith
My memory of the discussions accords with the summary given by Keith above. In addition, the general tenor of the discussion indicated to me that the two issues were linked: that consensus on limiting site-locals was contingent upon initiation of an effort to design a workable scheme for privately-routable PIs, with the global routing of PIs left for subsequent discussion. AEB -- Alan E. Beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AEBeard Consulting 4109 Chelsea Ln Lakeland FL 33809 863.815.2529 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
