My memory of the discussions accords with the summary given by Keith
above. In addition, the general tenor of the discussion indicated to me
that the two issues were linked: that consensus on limiting site-locals
was contingent upon initiation of an effort to design a workable scheme
for privately-routable PIs, with the global routing of PIs left for
subsequent discussion.
So the remaining question besides the PI issue would be to define "limit" then?
I had proposed limiting the use of site-locals to completely isolated
networks (i.e. test networks and/or networks that will never be
connected to other networks). This would give administrators of
those networks an address space to use (FECO::/10) for those networks
that wouldn't conflict with anyone else's and could be filtered by ISPs,
etc. (in case anyone ever makes a mistake and connects an "isolated"
network to the Internet). This is actually what site-local addresses
(and RFC 1918 addresses) were originally invented for...
Well, even though I still think that this will create more problems that it solve, it would at least keep that current state (which is pretty bad though).



If we limit site-locals to this case, they can be treated _exactly_ like
globals in all implementations (since they will be global to any network
In implementations - yes. For application layer protocols like IP-Sec, VoIP, SIP etc they still have the potential to create problems if misused (and they will be)

I'm working on a draft that explains why I believe that site-locals
need to be limited to this extreme, and that draft will provider further
details of the proposal. I'm actually NOT proposing any automatic
mechanism to enforce this restriction, as I just think that makes
implementations larger and more cluttered.
What I would like the chairs to do is go and ask the applications area to write a draft on the impact on applications of SLs, GUPIs, GULS and "real" IPs.

- kurtis -

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to