> Keith Moore wrote:
> I don't think we need to solve the global routing
> problem for PI addresses to be beneficial. PI
> addresses are extremely useful even if they can only
> be routed by private agreement between networks.
> Trying to make PI addresses be suitable for global
> routing as a pre-condition for having PI addresses
> strikes me as self-defeating. It's nice if it works
> out that way, but it should not be considered a
> necessary condition.

It is not, but asking for PI with no plan to manage the risk of
"privately routed PI" ending up "globally routed PI mess" is a
non-starter. One of the surest ways to kill IPv6 is to make it the same
crud as IPv4 with more bits.

Michel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to