> Keith Moore wrote: > I don't think we need to solve the global routing > problem for PI addresses to be beneficial. PI > addresses are extremely useful even if they can only > be routed by private agreement between networks. > Trying to make PI addresses be suitable for global > routing as a pre-condition for having PI addresses > strikes me as self-defeating. It's nice if it works > out that way, but it should not be considered a > necessary condition.
It is not, but asking for PI with no plan to manage the risk of "privately routed PI" ending up "globally routed PI mess" is a non-starter. One of the surest ways to kill IPv6 is to make it the same crud as IPv4 with more bits. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------