Kurtis, GUPI would not be globally routable. It would be a way to make sites privately communicate, as neither the "limited usage" or the "moderate usage" of site-locals provides this.
Michel. > Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > I must have misunderstood something really seriously here. > What is the difference between how we allocate PI space > today (well, there is no swamp space in IPv6 of course) > compared to the GUPI model? If I have got all this right > we are suggesting to take a prefix and use it as PI space, > right? Now this is just a matter of the number of holes > and the size of them? As an network operator there would > be no difference at all. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
