Alain Durand wrote:
Pekka Savola wrote:
3.0 IANA Considerations
The following prefix is reserved for use in documentation and MUST
NOT be assigned to any operational IPv6 nodes:
2000:0001::/32
==> I do not understand why this reservation has been made; I see zero
technical reason for it -- and it would prevent the use of the full
2000::/16 for something else.
I disagree. Having the reserved prefix is a good think and
will hopefully prevent what happen when Sun folks started
documenting examples using our address space.
I will agree with Alain that a reserved prefix for documentation is
good. But, I don't understand why '2000:0001::/32" was chosen instead
of '2000:0000::/32'. Can someone speak to this?
Fred
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
