On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Michel Py wrote: > > Jeroen Massar wrote: > > Nevertheless it would be great if loadbalancers sported IPv6 > > as it would mean that they also could handle huge sites like > > CNN and Google which would be one way to allow them to upgrade > > to IPv6. > > Yep. As I have said before, as long as CNN, Google, eBay, eTrade, Yahoo > and consorts are not IPv6 enabled (which also means multihomed for these > guys) IPv6 does not exist for the general public.
Not quite: I disagree with your last statement. Nothing stipulates that all, or even a commonly used part of, Internet applications must use IPv6 before "IPv6 exists for the general public". For example, a single popular p2p app could do it just fine. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
