I'm in favour of B.
I use SL addressing today to achieve address stability in a 6to4 environment.
The current drafts look like progress to me and remove the biggest wart of SL: ambiguity.


- aidan

Bob Hinden wrote:

B) Deprecate Site-Local addresses at the same time as a alternative solution is agreed to. This would mean advancing both documents at the same time and making them include normative references to each other to insure that they were published at the same time. This would result in the deprecation only happening if a consensus was reached on an alternative.



-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to