--On Tuesday, August 05, 2003 10:00 -0700 Fred Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hans Kruse wrote:
There is real danger here; I have already started to see mailing list discussion going something like: Q. What address prefix do I use for this network before I get my provider prefix? A1. Use FECO (Site Local). A2. No, No, FECO has been outlawed by the IETF, just invent a prefix!
I have seen the 2002 mapping of RFC 1918 suggested.
"Private" space will appear -- I want a version that is thought out, that is well documented and understood, not a mish-mash of hijacked prefixes and IPv6'afied RFC1918 stuff.
Perhaps you havn't seen 'draft-hinden-ipv6-global-local-addr-02.txt'?
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hans Kruse, Associate Professor J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
