Alain Durand wrote:... IMHO, what need to happen is the following:
-1. Make an in-depth study of the consequences of introducing addresses with different ranges.
This is not an introduction, they happened long ago ...
...but what has happened _now_ is that people wake up and see that introduction was possibly wrong, so the decision must be revoked.
We better remove this while we don't have any large deployment of IPv6. The longer we wait, the more problematic the surgery will be.
Using "we already have this written down" is for me not an argument keeping it.
Just look at what happens with DNSSEC (RFC 2535) at the moment! It is NEVER too late to regret a decision.
paf
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
