On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 05:29:37PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Eliot, > > That seems to me to be orthogonal. I agree that it would be good to see > renumbering support (maybe it's a v6ops item??). But that doesn't destroy > the value of Bob's proposal.
Best practice and standards consideration to make IPv6 renumbering less painful than IPv4 would seem an ideal v6ops WG item. It doesn't remove the need for PI, but it could help in the meantime. Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
