I will be interested in reviewing this and might also contribute some text to the draft.
Jack On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yar...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > This draft proposes an extensibility framework for WESP, as well as several > specific extensions. > > > > Proposed starting point: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-montenegro-ipsecme-wesp-extensions-00.txt. > > > > Please reply to the list: > > > > - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to > review multiple versions of the draft? > > - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft? > > - Would you like to co-author it? > > > > Please also reply to the list if: > > > > - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time on. > > > > If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine > technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the > draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the > industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export > in IPsec - NO!"). > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > > _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
