Tero Kivinen and David Wierbowski had some discussions on and off the list that resulted in the new text in 2.8.2 that mentions sending TEMPOARY_FAILURE and I acted as the scribe. I have been a proponent of avoiding sending TEMPORARY_FAILURE to a peer that does not understand it by incrementing the minor version number and only sending it to IKEv2.1 peers. Incrementing the minor version number got shot down, primarily by Tero. Therefore, perhaps Tero could suggest the additional sentence for section 2.8.2 that describes what will happen if a peer that does not understand TEMPORARY_FAILURE receives it.
> Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:03:44 -0800 > From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> > Subject: [IPsec] Issue #150: What happens if the peer receives > TEMPORARY_FAILURE and does not understand it > To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org> > Message-ID: <p0624080fc77d20105...@[10.20.30.158]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > 2.8.2: we should add a sentence on what happens if the peer receives > TEMPORARY_FAILURE and does not understand it (because it's new to this spec).
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
