Dan Harkins writes: > That's a really good point. Had it been "Specification Required" all > along XAUTH might've gotten an official code point. And who knows maybe > one of the j-random proposals might be just that. But IKEv1 really is > pretty done. At this point I'm pretty sure that j would be zero.
Most likely not, as all IPsec work had to be stopped so we could ship the IPsec out... IPSRA was supposed to do things like XAUTH and Configuration mode etc, but it failed... -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
