Hi Johannes,
note that this discussion is still a bit tentative, as we are working
with Sean to add the "DH checks" draft into our charter. But anyway...
For formal reasons, I would like to avoid a dependency from "DH Checks"
on Brainpool. So the better option is #2: have Brainpool I-Ds refer to
our I-D in their IANA Considerations.
I would like to use this opportunity to wish everyone on this list Happy
Holidays and a Happy New Year. Paul and I did consider creating a
Christmas video for your enjoyment (like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YR-d3JHYec&feature=youtu.be), luckily
for everyone we decided to skip it this year :-)
Yaron
On 12/20/2012 04:05 PM, Johannes Merkle wrote:
I.e. make the document define the generic ideas in the body, make IANA
considerations section to add the note field to the IANA registry,
which specifies this RFC and subsection in it for each group.
Which way to prefer for the "new" EC groups, i.e. the Brainpool I-Ds from Dan
and me?
1. Also include references to these I-D in the draft IKE Diffie-Hellman checks
2. Include a note in the IANA section of each Brainpool I-D to add for these
curves a reference to the corresponding
section of the DH-checks RFC?
Johannes
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
