ok thank you. I will try notification.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Black, David <david.bl...@emc.com> wrote: > > Correct. > > you'd have to write an ID on a new Notify type. > > Or on a new Configuration Attribute if that's more appropriate - > see section 3.15.1 of RFC 5996. > > Thanks, > --David > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of > > Michael Richardson > > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 12:18 PM > > To: Paul Simon > > Cc: <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tero Kivinen > > Subject: Re: [IPsec] Query regarding Qos with IKE > > > > > > Paul Simon <paulsimo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes now it is clear that IKE is not supposed to do DSCP negotiation > > > Thanks for the explanations. > > > > *negotiation* is the key word. > > negotiation != notification > > > > > [PAUL] I have gone through RFC 5996 section 3.10.1 notify message > types. > > > But could not find a suitable message type to convey dscp > information. > > > Can you suggest which notification message should be used here ? > > > > Correct. > > you'd have to write an ID on a new Notify type. > > > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works > > > >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
