I agree. The point I wanted to make is that multicore can be made for both in ESPv3 and in ESPv4 so we do not wait for ESPv4 to handle multicore. The two mechanisms may be slightly different but I expect some commonalities. As a result, I expect early deployments on ESPv3 may provide some useful feedback for ESPv4.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 2:03 AM Steffen Klassert < steffen.klass...@secunet.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:16:08PM -0500, Daniel Migault wrote: > > I support Bob's suggestion. > > I also believe that multicore will be addressed by design. I do want to > > have some mechanisms like [1] to be included by design. That said, I > would > > like [1] to start on ESPv3 and take the output back to ESPv-4 as opposed > to > > waiting for ESP-v4. > > I disagree. If we touch ESP, everything should be on the table and > we should consider that all together. > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
