On 30/05/2013 08:36, Tim Chown wrote: > > On 30 May 2013, at 07:23, Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2013-05-29 23:19, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: >>> I do not mind too much getting packets with a ULA as source address; >>> not perfect but I can live with those packets >> >> Hmm, you say till the day you receive a 100G of spoofed packets... and >> that is what they are as nobody is able to claim they "own" those prefixes. > > Would be interesting to see how much IPv6 traffic hits the DNS roots from > link-local or ULA sources. Anyone have any info?
For a days worth (2013-05-28) of IPv6 traffic to k-root I found these non 2000::/3 IPv6 sources: ##address pkt_count :: 23 ::10.28.254.28 1 ::12 1 fc00:bbb:30:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 2 fc10:2:e102:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 162 fc10:2:e103:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 66 fd00:0:ac:1400:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 1 fd01:db8:f00:a0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 63 fd02:c9e3:a6c0:3d02:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 146 fd02:c9e3:a6c0:3d03:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 36 fd02:c9e3:a6c1:2502:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 1 fd02:c9e3:a6c1:2d02:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 9 fd12:e602:eec4:6487:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 10 fd15:10fb:654a:1:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 5 fd15:10fb:654a:1:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 19 fd19:f3c4:8c30:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 242 fd5e:21e:ad1c:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 5 fd90:5cdd:b6e3:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 92 fda0:747e:ab29:2196:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 48 fdb2:2c26:f4e4:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 2 fdbc:7dda:f921:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 1 fdcb:3fb1:918:1:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 12 fde6:8bfc:fdf1:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 12 fdfa:ec97:5437:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 16 fdfa:ec97:5437:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 1845 fec0:0:0:fea9:0:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX 1 out of a total of 95258 uniq IPv6 sources (out of 5483 uniq /32s). hth, Emile
