Whoa, sorry if this got that far out of context! I very expressly believe that a local scheme in general, and the one in draft-hinden in particular, is needed for a number of scenarios!

--On Monday, November 03, 2003 17:12 -0800 Christian Huitema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hans,

You have clearly stated your point. You, and several others, believe
that local addressing is not needed. However, I don't believe that the
working group should heed your opposition. Something is needed if a
significant part of the community believes they need it; unanimity is
definitely not required, and even majority is not required.




Hans Kruse, Associate Professor J. Warren McClure School of Communication Systems Management Adjunct Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701 740-593-4891 voice, 740-593-4889 fax

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to