On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:29:55 -0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > How about simply calling whatever we end up with > > "organizational addresses"? > > I think that captures it much better than "local", "site > > local", "private" > > or whatever. > > as others have pointed out these addresses will be used in > non-'organisational' scenarios. therefore i prefer 'local' as it has the > widest applicability. what is wrong with 'local'? >
I suppose that it tends to have implied geographical connotations if there is no qualifier as to what "local" is referring to. Maybe "entity local IPv6 unicast addresses" ? Still slightly too generic for my mind, but possibly better than "organi[sz]ation" ? Regards, Mark. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
