Brian Haberman wrote: > I'm curious, have you read draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt? > The locally assigned prefixes come out of the FD00::/8 range and > the centrally assigned prefixes come out of the FC00::/8 range. Can > you explain to me why you think they will collide at some point? > To be honest, as stated in another e-mail, I have not read the draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt, I am catching up on drafts and will read it soon.
Can you explain why are we allocating another range for locally assigned prefixes, rather than reusing the FEC8:; FEC9:: spaces that were used this way and are now going to stay unallocated? Why tie up a second range? Eric -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
