Hi Tim, hi Ralph, I also completely agree with Ralphs wording. Tim: regarding the issue you address:
> So the question is should the wording of (a) and (b) be changed to reflect > the processing text of (c)? On their own, (a) and (b) suggest that to get > the behaviour of (c) *both* the M and O bits should be set, but (c) states > that only the M bit need be set for full stateful autoconfiguration. In my eyes, (a) and (b) should be reworked to reflect the behaviour described in (c). If the M flag is set, deciding which additional information is to be sent or if it is sent at all is a matter of the DHCPv6 server's configuration. Christian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
