% > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:16:49AM -0800, Alain Durand wrote:
% > >
% > > Billing & recurrent fees is a way to guaranty that the database will be
% > > maintainable.
% >
% > With 1,000 billion entries, it might also become a large database...
%
% That's why proof of ownership should be distributed to the prefix
% recipient, who would hold on to an allocation statement signed by an
% escrowed key.
%
% The registries just need to escrow their keys, and maintain enough state
% to ensure that they don't issue duplicate allocations.
%
%
% Regards,
%
% =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
% Steven L. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd -REALLY- like to get the IETF legal team involved
if this WG is seriously contemplating turning IP prefixes
into owned property. 1,000 billion registrations
at 1.0 eu per anum is an -HUGE- business.
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
