The routing or spanning tree solution is the most transparent to the
hosts, since it does not change any byte in the ND packets. However,
transparency may not be entirely desired, since SEND requires being
fairly explicit about relays.
Yes. In fact, an explicit marker telling that there indeed was a proxy would be quite useful for SEND.
Fred Templin wrote:
In other words, we need something like the experimental protocols
coming from the MANET wg (e.g., AODV, DSR, OLSR, TBRPF).
Even better would be a unified mechanism that combines the best
aspects of on-demand and reactive protocols.
Hmm.... I thought the idea of ND proxies was to avoid a complicated L3 device. If we need something like a routing protocol, maybe its time to pull out the proxy thing and replace it with a real L3 device?
--Jari
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
