-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2004-04-13, at 20.37, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 2004-04-13, at 15.53, JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote: > >> Is there any other reason for not being clear on this (i.e., not >> clearly say the stateful protocol is DHCPv6)? Or is this just a >> matter of preference? > > I would prefer 2+Y. Simply to minimize dependencies... After reading the first mail a bit closer...I am all for referring to DHCPv6, I was arguing for not making a direct reference to the RFC but rather to the node-req document. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQHw5X6arNKXTPFCVEQJEHgCffOSvNFLZf7r38dKKt89gtjnLUa0AoI5g DXQvB8suMdWQt6Zu4c1Mh0p5 =kS0m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
