On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:42:29PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > > Explicit support or objections are highly appreciated. If the list is > still silent, I'll start revising the document anyway.
I agree with the changes, though... > > - remove "requirement" sentences like the following one > > If the value of ManagedFlag changes from FALSE to TRUE, > > and the host is not already running the stateful address > > autoconfiguration protocol, the host should invoke the stateful > > address autoconfiguration protocol, requesting both address > > information and other information. > > (Section 5.5.3 of RFC2462) > > - remove Section 5.5.2 of RFC2462 (that mandates performing the > > "stateful" protocol when no RAs) Perhaps these can be written as "may" rather than "should"? Tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
