>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:01:44 +0100,
>>>>> Tim Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Explicit support or objections are highly appreciated. If the list is
>> still silent, I'll start revising the document anyway.
> I agree with the changes, though...
>> > - remove "requirement" sentences like the following one
>> > If the value of ManagedFlag changes from FALSE to TRUE,
>> > and the host is not already running the stateful address
>> > autoconfiguration protocol, the host should invoke the stateful
>> > address autoconfiguration protocol, requesting both address
>> > information and other information.
>> > (Section 5.5.3 of RFC2462)
>> > - remove Section 5.5.2 of RFC2462 (that mandates performing the
>> > "stateful" protocol when no RAs)
> Perhaps these can be written as "may" rather than "should"?
Please let me check: are you suggesting to replace the "should"s with
"may"s instead of removing these sentences (which is my proposal)?
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
