On 2004-08-03, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > > To save time, here is a summary of my opinion on the substantial > request to optimistic DAD.
Thanks Jinmei. I think we're not that far apart in our opinions after all :-) > Finally, I admit some of the above points may be controversial, and > different people in the working group may have different opinions. Of > course, I'll follow the wg consensus and I'm not going to stick to my > points if it's "just me". Same here! Such is the way of rough consensus :-) If anyone on the list has strong opinions on any of the issues, please step forward and be counted :-) Thanks for digesting the big issues down, I've added these three points to the issues list, and I'm revising my presentation to focus on these things since I feel they're the most urgent to discuss with the WG. cheers, -----Nick -- Nick 'Sharkey' Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://zoic.org/sharkey/> "A thing should be as simple as it is and no simpler." -- Albert Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
