On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Bob Hinden wrote: > I agree that saying "sending to the IETF" is not workable and the > instructions need to be more explicit. Since this topic since this comes > up in many drafts, I wonder if the IETF should set up a specific alias that > these requests can be sent to so they won't be lost in the mail sent to the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am, in parallel, asking if a new alias can be set up for > sending this type of reqest to the IESG.
One could ask them to be Cc'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Their business is ticketing the messages and making sure things don't fall under the cracks? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
