Mukesh,

A first sentence like:

"The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable per node,
if the node has similar speed/bandwidth interfaces, and/or per interface, if the node has disimilar speed/bandwidth interfaces".

or

"The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable per node,
if the node has similar interfaces, and/or per interface, if the node has disimilar speed/bandwidth interfaces".

would be more explicit/descriptive.

The rest is fine.

Thanks,
Alex


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex,

Thanks for pointing this out.  What do you think about the following
as the replacement text?

=============
The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable. In the
case of a token-bucket implementation, the best defaults depend
on the computational power of the device and the speed/bandwidth of the interfaces that it has (e.g., a high-end router vs. an embedded host, a 10G ethernet vs. a T1 interface). For example, in a small/mid -sized device with limited bandwidth interfaces, the possible defaults could be B=10, N=10/s.
==============

Regards
Mukesh


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
ext Alex Conta
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:17 AM
To: IPv6
Subject: Section 2.4, item (f) of draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt


The last paragraph of Section 2.4, item (f) of draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt is pointing to ICMP rate limiting configurability on a per node basis.

ICMP Rate-limiting configurability makes sense also on a per interface basis.

In a case of a router having different speed/bandwidth interfaces, for example IPv6 interfaces on fast links, as well as slower links, the adequate ICMP rate-limiting parameters on a 1G or 10G Ethernet, could be quite different from a T1, or T3 link.

Regards,
Alex






Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to