Alex, Thanks.. I will update the text in the next rev.
Regards Mukesh > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Alex Conta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:55 PM > To: Gupta Mukesh (Nokia-NET/MtView) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Section 2.4, item (f) of draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt > > > Mukesh, > > A first sentence like: > > "The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable per node, > if the node has similar speed/bandwidth interfaces, and/or per > interface, if the node has disimilar speed/bandwidth interfaces". > > or > > "The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable per node, > if the node has similar interfaces, and/or per interface, if the node > has disimilar speed/bandwidth interfaces". > > would be more explicit/descriptive. > > The rest is fine. > > Thanks, > Alex > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Alex, > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. What do you think about the following > > as the replacement text? > > > > ============= > > The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable. In the > > case of a token-bucket implementation, the best > defaults depend > > on the computational power of the device and the > speed/bandwidth > > of the interfaces that it has (e.g., a high-end > router vs. an > > embedded host, a 10G ethernet vs. a T1 interface). > For example, > > in a small/mid -sized device with limited bandwidth > interfaces, > > the possible defaults could be B=10, N=10/s. > > ============== > > > > Regards > > Mukesh > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > >>ext Alex Conta > >>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:17 AM > >>To: IPv6 > >>Subject: Section 2.4, item (f) of draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt > >> > >> > >>The last paragraph of Section 2.4, item (f) of > >>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt is pointing to ICMP rate limiting > >>configurability on a per node basis. > >> > >>ICMP Rate-limiting configurability makes sense also on a per > >>interface > >>basis. > >> > >>In a case of a router having different speed/bandwidth > >>interfaces, for > >>example IPv6 interfaces on fast links, as well as slower > links, the > >>adequate ICMP rate-limiting parameters on a 1G or 10G > >>Ethernet, could be > >>quite different from a T1, or T3 link. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Alex > >> > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
