Pekka, Do we need two implementations even for SHOULD items ?
I don't know of any. I don't claim to know a lot of ICMP implementations though ;) If we don't have 2 implementations, what should we do ? Should we make "per node" as SHOULD and "per interface" as MAY ? Regards Mukesh > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 8:51 AM > To: Alex Conta > Cc: Gupta Mukesh (Nokia-NET/MtView); [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Section 2.4, item (f) of draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-04.txt > > > On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Alex Conta wrote: > > "The rate-limiting parameters SHOULD be configurable per node, > > if the node has similar speed/bandwidth interfaces, and/or per > > interface, if the node has disimilar speed/bandwidth interfaces". > > I'm slightly concerned whether we have two implementations of > interface-specific rate-limiting parameters, required for Draft > Standard. Do you know of any? > > -- > Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the > Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." > Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
