In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:22:40 +0100), Zefram 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> On the choice of innocuous character I have no strong opinion.  "_"
> seems fine.  I note that ";" would be harmonious with existing syntax

I disagree to use "_" here because [v6.fe80::1_de0] may be 
recognized as it were [ v6 . fe80 :: 1_de0 ] (not [ v6 . fe80::1 _ de0 ])
at a glance.

--yoshfuji



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to