On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:24 -0400 Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPv6 WG, > This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in > draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt. At this time the chairs believe it > is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned > ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue) > before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism. > > The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this > approach. Please state your support or disagreement with this > approach. Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting > to continue this work at this time. > I agree with this approach. I'd be interested to know if there is a somewhat formal process for collecting or just documenting the data about this operational experience. Any (offlist if necessary) pointers or references would be appreciated. Regards, Mark. -- The Internet's nature is peer to peer. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------