On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:21:24 -0400
Brian Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPv6 WG,
> This is a status update on the centrally-allocated ULAs defined in
> draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-01.txt. At this time the chairs believe it
> is prudent to gain operational experience with the locally-assigned
> ULA specification (which is currently in the RFC Editor's Queue)
> before continuing work on the centrally-allocated mechanism.
>
> The chairs would like to solicit input from WG members on this
> approach. Please state your support or disagreement with this
> approach. Those who disagree, please state rationale for wanting
> to continue this work at this time.
>
I agree with this approach.
I'd be interested to know if there is a somewhat formal process for
collecting or just documenting the data about this operational
experience. Any (offlist if necessary) pointers or references would be
appreciated.
Regards,
Mark.
--
The Internet's nature is peer to peer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
